Radioactive dating turin shroud
The roots of these plants, sometimes having decomposed, are nearly indistinguishable from the older peat.What ends up being tested is a mixture of old and new material which produces an average, meaningless carbon 14 age.The 1988 carbon 14 dating failure will not be ignored; for how does one ignore such a famous example.It should not be ignored because of the lessons to be learned.It cannot be ignored so long students raise hands and Google-check lecture notes.It should not be ignored when journalists and authors write about carbon 14 dating.
The will ask why documented data was not considered.
Rogers, Los Alamos National Laboratory, University of California) makes it perfectly clear: the carbon 14 dating sample cut from the Shroud in 1988 was not valid.
In fact, the Shroud is much older than the carbon 14 tests suggested. No matter what any one of us may believe about the Shroud’s authenticity, we can no longer say that carbon 14 dating proves medieval origins; for the tests in 1988 were botched.
There are, in understanding what went wrong, important lessons that will ripple through archeology, anthropology, forensics and science lecture halls whenever and wherever carbon 14 dating is discussed.
Students will ask why a single sample from a suspect corner was used.